翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R&R (Rare & Remixed)
・ R&R Associates
・ R&R Group
・ R&R Ice Cream
・ R v Owen
・ R v Pamajewon
・ R v Pan; R v Sawyer
・ R v Panel on Take-overs and Mergers, ex p Datafin plc
・ R v Park
・ R v Parks
・ R v Patel
・ R v Patrick
・ R v Peacock
・ R v Pearson; Ex parte Sipka
・ R v Penguin Books Ltd
R v Perka
・ R v Peverett
・ R v Plant
・ R v Powley
・ R v Prince
・ R v Pritchard
・ R v Prosper
・ R v Quick
・ R v Rahey
・ R v Reed
・ R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal
・ R v Richards
・ R v Richardson
・ R v Rodgers
・ R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Perka : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Perka

''R v Perka'', () 2 S.C.R. 232 is, along with R v Latimer, a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal defence of necessity.
==Background==
In 1979 a group of Cali, Colombia marijuana traffickers headed by Jaime deJesus Cordoba-Vargas and Jaime deJesus Marin-Jaramillo organized a venture to smuggle marijuana into the U.S. aboard the 168-foot motor vessel ''Samarkanda'', a surplus U.S. Navy net tender converted to a tug and once called ''Alexandra''. The standard procedure for the group was to load contraband on "mother ships" in South America, sail north, then rendezvous with smaller "contact" vessels off the U.S. coast. They operated under the theory that if the ship picked up contraband on the high seas and delivered it on the high seas they would not violate any national laws except perhaps that of its flag country, Colombia. To a certain extent, the smugglers were correct.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Perka」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.